Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

Page text matches

  • ...nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=29276.0 EM Drive Developments - Thread 1] | [[NSF Thread 1]]
    5 KB (679 words) - 09:00, 13 July 2018
  • ...ion (for example, using the wavenumber). The reason for this is two fold: 1) There is no standard convention on how to number mode shapes for a truncat ...Q corresponds to zero damping. Critical damping occurs for a value of Q = 1/2.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor]</ref> || Force (mN) || Force / P
    18 KB (2,518 words) - 13:25, 29 September 2017
  • |1 ||1 || Currently a test.
    733 bytes (98 words) - 09:20, 6 May 2015
  • |1 || AIAA JPC 2014: Theory of a Mach Effect Thruster || [http://forum.nasaspa |1 || A Note on the Principles of EmDrive force measurement|| http://www.emdri
    6 KB (746 words) - 07:20, 21 May 2015
  • Items 1-4 Located at [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg131
    1 KB (162 words) - 07:58, 14 May 2015
  • ...aveguides"] by Xiahui Zeng and Dianyuan Fan. Optics Express Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 34-45 (2009) •doi: 10.1364/OE.17.000034 .... Bliokh, Aleksandr Y. Bekshaev, and Franco Nori - See Supplementary Table 1.
    5 KB (719 words) - 14:02, 9 August 2015
  • ...an the emdrive be explained by quantised inertia? Progress in Physics, 11, 1, 78-80]</ref><ref>[http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1209/0295-5075/111/ <math>F = {P \cdot Q \cdot L\over c} \times \left({1 \over Ds} - {1 \over Db}\right)</math>
    5 KB (759 words) - 04:32, 19 March 2017
  • 1. A purely passive Virtual Frustum uses only wave self-interference to gener
    16 KB (2,364 words) - 03:52, 21 February 2017
  • [1,1]=3.83, [0,1]=2.40, [0,2]=5.52 [1,2]=7.02, [2,1]=5.14, [2,2]=8.42, [1,3]=10.17, etc. [0,1]=3.83, [1,1]=1.84, [2,1]=3.05, [0,2]=7.02, [1,2]=5.33, [1,3]=8.54, [0,3]=10.17, [2,2]=6.71, etc.
    8 KB (1,268 words) - 10:32, 16 July 2015
  • '''Option 1''': Energy is conserved, but there is a preferred rest frame. In essence, t Since option 1 leads to a violation of general relativity and option 2 leads to a violatio
    7 KB (1,068 words) - 15:09, 7 August 2015
  • ...hed by R. H. Dicke, in 1957 and was known as the ''"eps, mu formalism"''. [1] Before he had conceived of the General Relativity (GR) theory, Albert Eins
    9 KB (1,434 words) - 10:13, 10 December 2016
  • 1) Used a scale directly under the EMDrive.
    1 KB (226 words) - 19:39, 18 June 2015
  • ...'s [https://www.dropbox.com/s/u6v90c5yb050u52/EMDriveCalc20150809a.xlsx?dl=1 EMDrive design spreadsheet], developed in cooperation with Roger Shawyer, l '''1) Using a scale directly under or offset to one side of the EMDrive.'''
    1 KB (203 words) - 07:59, 24 August 2015
  • 1) 90t or 90,000kgs ...error in the integration. frobnicat has discussed in NSF EM Drive Threads 1 and 2 other flaws in this analysis. For the ion rocket consideration, the
    7 KB (1,125 words) - 19:24, 26 July 2015
  • Title: <strong>EM Drive Developments Thread 1</strong><br/> ...ings prove to be wrong or an error somewhere along the line, it&#039;s the 1 that makes them interesting.:)
    6.57 MB (1,069,908 words) - 08:45, 29 June 2015
  • ....nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=29276.0<br/><br/>Problems with Thread 1 explained (note the things to avoid in the new thread):<br/>http://forum.na ...=899.12<br/><br/><hr/>&nbsp; (* Brady c&nbsp; TE mode *)<br/>rfFrequency = 1.8804*10^9;<br/><br/>power = 2.6<br/>Q = 22000 <br/><br/>measured force = 0.
    8.74 MB (1,429,976 words) - 08:47, 29 June 2015
  • * Meep 1.3 (compiled & installed from its sources<ref>https://github.com/stevengj/me * Harminv 1.4 (id)
    14 KB (2,076 words) - 22:24, 9 March 2016
  • ...will be removed via moderation. This subject has large interest, with over 1.5 million thread reads and 600,000 article reads. Most people are reading a ...wavelength.<br/><br/>3) Get TM mode E field frustum end plate to end plate 1/2 wave resonance (TM01 equivalent) at the numerically integrated guide wave
    13.76 MB (2,268,703 words) - 12:26, 7 August 2015
  • ...ong>, etc.<br/><br/>--<br/><br/>Links to previous threads:<br/><br/>Thread 1:<br/>http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=29276.0<br/><br/>Thre ...equation is (I know it&#039;s messy):<br/><br/>((P*Q*L)/c)*((1/L+Pi*Br^2)-(1/L+Pi*Sr^2))<br/><br/>P = Power in Watts<br/>Q = Q<br/>L = Length<br/>c = Sp
    4.61 MB (762,332 words) - 15:41, 5 October 2015
  • 1
    1 bytes (0 words) - 04:06, 13 January 2016

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)