Difference between revisions of "Theory"
From EM Drive
(Created page with "This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation). 8/5/14 - Greg Egan did some [http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Cavity/Cavity.html modeled] the r...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation). | This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation). | ||
| − | 8/5/14 - Greg Egan | + | |
| + | 8/5/14 - Greg Egan [http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Cavity/Cavity.html modeled the resonant modes of a conical cavity]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2/2/15 - @areo [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1330521#msg1330521 modeled evanescent waves] using [http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep MEEP]. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust. | ||
Revision as of 14:16, 4 May 2015
This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).
8/5/14 - Greg Egan modeled the resonant modes of a conical cavity.
2/2/15 - @areo modeled evanescent waves using MEEP. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust.
