Dimensions - Revision history

Saucyjack: Moved chart to Experimental Results page and added link.

2015-05-20T18:23:17Z

Moved chart to Experimental Results page and added link.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 20 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~The current best-estimates for the dimensions of various test articles is here, along with the relevant experimental~~ parameters and ~~reported forces. Note that complete dimensions are not known in most cases, and some had~~ to ~~be determined via indirect methods (e.g., estimation from photographs).~~		All known and estimated device parameters and results have been moved to [[Experimental Results]].

	~~Credit to Dr. Rodal and others for the great effort in~~ [~~http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376840#msg1376840 compiling these~~]~~. Please note some caveats for this data, at that link.~~

	~~{\| class="wikitable"~~
	! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| Design Factor (Shawyer Only) \|\| Dielectric \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket
	\|-
	~~\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| \|\| None \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500~~
	\|-
	~~\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 0.497 \|\| None \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640~~
	\|-
	~~\|Shawyer Demo\|\| 0.345 \|\| 0.28 \|\| 0.09613 \|\| 0.844 \|\| None \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 421-1200\|\| 45000 \|\| 102.30 \|\| 80-243 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 23980 - 72830~~
	\|-
	~~\|Brady a TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.9326*10^9 \|\| 16.9\|\|7320 \|\| 0.0912\|\| 5.396 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 1617.2~~
	\|-
	~~\|Brady b TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.9367*10^9 \|\| 16.7\|\| 18100 \|\| 0.0501\|\| 3.000 \|\| 0.003337 \|\|899.12~~
	\|-
	~~\|Brady c TE Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7~~
	\|-
	~~\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1377061#msg1377061 Forum post by @Rodal~~] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.~~526~~
	\|-
	\|}

	~~== References ==~~
	~~<references/>~~

Saucyjack: Fix typo in link to post by Rodal

2015-05-20T18:10:50Z

Fix typo in link to post by Rodal

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 20 May 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|Brady c TE Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TE Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.~~msg1376924~~#~~msg1376924~~ Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1377061#msg1377061 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Saucyjack: Added Dielectric column, fix typo on Brady c TE Mode

2015-05-20T17:48:31Z

Added Dielectric column, fix typo on Brady c TE Mode

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:48, 20 May 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| Design Factor (Shawyer Only) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket		! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| Design Factor (Shawyer Only) \|\| Dielectric \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket
	\|-		\|-
	\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500		\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| \|\| None \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500
	\|-		\|-
	\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 0.497 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640		\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 0.497 \|\| None \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640
	\|-		\|-
	\|Shawyer Demo\|\| 0.345 \|\| 0.28 \|\| 0.09613 \|\| 0.844 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 421-1200\|\| 45000 \|\| 102.30 \|\| 80-243 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 23980 - 72830		\|Shawyer Demo\|\| 0.345 \|\| 0.28 \|\| 0.09613 \|\| 0.844 \|\| None \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 421-1200\|\| 45000 \|\| 102.30 \|\| 80-243 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 23980 - 72830
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady a TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.9326*10^9 \|\| 16.9\|\|7320 \|\| 0.0912\|\| 5.396 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 1617.2		\|Brady a TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.9326*10^9 \|\| 16.9\|\|7320 \|\| 0.0912\|\| 5.396 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 1617.2
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady b TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.9367*10^9 \|\| 16.7\|\| 18100 \|\| 0.0501\|\| 3.000 \|\| 0.003337 \|\|899.12		\|Brady b TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.9367*10^9 \|\| 16.7\|\| 18100 \|\| 0.0501\|\| 3.000 \|\| 0.003337 \|\|899.12
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TE Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| HDPE \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Saucyjack at 17:03, 20 May 2015

2015-05-20T17:03:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 20 May 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| ~~n/a~~ \|\| ~~n/a~~ \|\| ~~n/a~~ \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Saucyjack: Added Design Factor where applicable

2015-05-20T17:03:01Z

Added Design Factor where applicable

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:03, 20 May 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket		! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| Design Factor (Shawyer Only) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket
	\|-		\|-
	\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500		\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500
	\|-		\|-
	\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640		\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 0.497 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640
	\|-		\|-
	\|Shawyer Demo\|\| 0.345 \|\| 0.28 \|\| 0.09613 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 421-1200\|\| 45000 \|\| 102.30 \|\| 80-243 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 23980 - 72830		\|Shawyer Demo\|\| 0.345 \|\| 0.28 \|\| 0.09613 \|\| 0.844 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 421-1200\|\| 45000 \|\| 102.30 \|\| 80-243 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 23980 - 72830
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady a TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.9326*10^9 \|\| 16.9\|\|7320 \|\| 0.0912\|\| 5.396 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 1617.2		\|Brady a TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.9326*10^9 \|\| 16.9\|\|7320 \|\| 0.0912\|\| 5.396 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 1617.2
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady b TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.9367*10^9 \|\| 16.7\|\| 18100 \|\| 0.0501\|\| 3.000 \|\| 0.003337 \|\|899.12		\|Brady b TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.9367*10^9 \|\| 16.7\|\| 18100 \|\| 0.0501\|\| 3.000 \|\| 0.003337 \|\|899.12
	\|-		\|-
	\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Saucyjack at 16:53, 20 May 2015

2015-05-20T16:53:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:53, 20 May 2015
Line 4:		Line 4:

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"
	! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Multiple of Photon Rocket		! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Force Multiple of Photon Rocket
	\|-		\|-
	\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500		\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500

Saucyjack: Added note about including MET thruster

2015-05-20T16:50:52Z

Added note about including MET thruster

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 20 May 2015
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster (Woodward Mach Effect)\|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>\|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

			== References ==
			<references/>

Saucyjack: Fix typo, clarify MET thruster device

2015-05-20T16:39:12Z

Fix typo, clarify MET thruster device

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:39, 20 May 2015
Line 6:		Line 6:
	! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Multiple of Photon Rocket		! style="text-align:left;"\| Description \|\| Cavity Length (m) \|\| bigDiameter (m) \|\| smallDiameter (m) \|\| rfFrequency (1/s) \|\| Power (W) \|\| Q \|\| Force (mN) \|\| Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) \|\| Multiple of Photon Rocket
	\|-		\|-
	\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| ~~7.61~~.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500		\|Cannae Superconducting \|\| 0.03 \|\| 0.220 \|\| 0.200 \|\| 1.04710^9 \|\| 10.5 \|\| 1.110^7 \|\| 8-10 \|\| 761.9 - 952.4 \|\| 0.003336 \|\| 228400 - 285500
	\|-		\|-
	\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640		\|Shawyer Experimental \|\| 0.156 \|\| 0.16 \|\| 0.1025 \|\| 2.45*10^9 \|\| 850 \|\| 5900 \|\| 16 \|\| 18.82 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 5640
Line 18:		Line 18:
	\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7		\|Brady c TM Mode\|\| 0.2286 \|\| 0.2794 \|\| 0.15875 \|\| 1.8804*10^9 \|\| 2.6\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.05541\|\| 21.31 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 6386.7
	\|-		\|-
	\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser\|\| ~~0.2286~~ \|\| ~~0.2794~~ \|\| ~~0.15875~~ \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526		\|Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster (Woodward Mach Effect)\|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| n/a \|\| 39300 \|\| 170\|\| 22000 \|\| 0.002\|\| 0.01176 \|\| 0.003337 \|\| 3.526
	\|-		\|-
	\|}		\|}

Saucyjack at 15:49, 20 May 2015

2015-05-20T15:49:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:49, 20 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The current best-~~estimate~~ for the dimensions of various test articles is here, along with the relevant experimental parameters and reported forces. Note that complete dimensions are not known in most cases, and some had to be determined via indirect methods (e.g., estimation from photographs).		The current best-estimates for the dimensions of various test articles is here, along with the relevant experimental parameters and reported forces. Note that complete dimensions are not known in most cases, and some had to be determined via indirect methods (e.g., estimation from photographs).

	Credit to Dr. Rodal for [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.~~msg1302455~~#~~msg1302455~~ compiling these].		Credit to Dr. Rodal and others for the great effort in [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376840#msg1376840 compiling these]. Please note some caveats for this data, at that link.

	{\| class="wikitable"		{\| class="wikitable"

Saucyjack at 15:45, 20 May 2015

2015-05-20T15:45:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:45, 20 May 2015
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The current best-estimate for the dimensions of various test articles is here. ~~Exact~~ dimensions are not known in most cases.		The current best-estimate for the dimensions of various test articles is here, along with the relevant experimental parameters and reported forces. Note that complete dimensions are not known in most cases, and some had to be determined via indirect methods (e.g., estimation from photographs).

	Credit to Dr. Rodal for [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1302455#msg1302455 compiling these].		Credit to Dr. Rodal for [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1302455#msg1302455 compiling these].