Theory - Revision history

127.0.0.1: /* Proponent Theories */ Finnish researchers theory

2016-11-08T15:17:30Z

Proponent Theories: Finnish researchers theory

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:17, 8 November 2016
Line 13:		Line 13:
	* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>		* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>
	* Michael Harney's explanation based on WSM <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1604.0024 Improvement In The Thrust of the Electromagnetic Warp Drive Using Stimulated Emission Similar to a MASER]</ref>		* Michael Harney's explanation based on WSM <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1604.0024 Improvement In The Thrust of the Electromagnetic Warp Drive Using Stimulated Emission Similar to a MASER]</ref>
			*Finnish researchers theory<ref>http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/adva/6/6/10.1063/1.4953807</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==

Mharney at 23:04, 29 May 2016

2016-05-29T23:04:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:04, 29 May 2016
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.		* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.
	* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>		* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>
			* Michael Harney's explanation based on WSM <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1604.0024 Improvement In The Thrust of the Electromagnetic Warp Drive Using Stimulated Emission Similar to a MASER]</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==

Gilbert: Undo revision 1380 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

2016-05-09T20:01:05Z

Undo revision 1380 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:01, 9 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).		This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).

	~~Very nice site!~~		== Proponent Theories ==
			* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive basic theory <ref>[[File:EmDrive Basic Theory.ppt]]</ref>
			* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive full theory paper <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf Roger Shawyer EMDrive Theory]</ref>
			* Prof. Juan Yang's theory <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/yang-juan-paper-2012.pdf Prof Juan Yang EMDrive Theory and Results]</ref>
			* Dr. Harold Sonny White's Quantum vacuum plasma thruster model (QVP thruster)
			* [[Evanescent waves]]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1330521#msg1330521 2/2/15 post by @aero modeled evanescent waves] using [http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep MEEP]. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust.</ref>
			* [[@notsosureofit Hypothesis]]
			* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
			* [[Todd Desiato (@WarpTech)'s Evanescent Wave Theory]]
			* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.
			* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==

Gilbert: Undo revision 1382 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

2016-05-09T19:58:55Z

Undo revision 1382 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Very nice site!
-Very nice site!
+== Debunking Theories ==
 == References ==
 <references />

Gilbert: Undo revision 1387 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

2016-05-09T19:57:54Z

Undo revision 1387 by 127.0.0.1 (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:57, 9 May 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Very nice site!		Very nice site!

	~~Very nice site!~~		== References ==
			<references />

127.0.0.1: /* References */

2016-05-04T04:54:59Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 3 May 2016
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Very nice site!		Very nice site!

	~~== References ==~~		Very nice site!
	~~<references />~~

127.0.0.1: /* Debunking Theories */

2016-05-02T22:54:18Z

Debunking Theories

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 Very nice site!
-== Debunking Theories ==
+Very nice site!
 == References ==
 <references />

127.0.0.1: /* Proponent Theories */

2016-05-01T16:46:49Z

Proponent Theories

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:46, 1 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).		This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).

	~~== Proponent Theories ==~~		Very nice site!
	* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive basic theory <ref>[[File:EmDrive Basic Theory.ppt]]</ref>
	* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive full theory paper <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf Roger Shawyer EMDrive Theory]</ref>
	* Prof. Juan Yang's theory <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/yang-juan-paper-2012.pdf Prof Juan Yang EMDrive Theory and Results]</ref>
	* Dr. Harold Sonny White's Quantum vacuum plasma thruster model (QVP thruster)
	* [[Evanescent waves]]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1330521#msg1330521 2/2/15 post by @aero modeled evanescent waves] using [http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep MEEP]. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust.</ref>
	* [[@notsosureofit Hypothesis]]
	* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
	* [[Todd Desiato (@WarpTech)'s Evanescent Wave Theory]]
	* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.
	* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==

Gilbert: Undo revision 1378 by 127.0.0.1 (talk) Restauration of big deletion.

2016-05-01T09:27:37Z

Undo revision 1378 by 127.0.0.1 (talk) Restauration of big deletion.

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 1 May 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).		This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).

	~~Very nice site!~~		== Proponent Theories ==
			* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive basic theory <ref>[[File:EmDrive Basic Theory.ppt]]</ref>
			* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive full theory paper <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf Roger Shawyer EMDrive Theory]</ref>
			* Prof. Juan Yang's theory <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/yang-juan-paper-2012.pdf Prof Juan Yang EMDrive Theory and Results]</ref>
			* Dr. Harold Sonny White's Quantum vacuum plasma thruster model (QVP thruster)
			* [[Evanescent waves]]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1330521#msg1330521 2/2/15 post by @aero modeled evanescent waves] using [http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep MEEP]. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust.</ref>
			* [[@notsosureofit Hypothesis]]
			* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
			* [[Todd Desiato (@WarpTech)'s Evanescent Wave Theory]]
			* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.
			* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==

127.0.0.1: /* Proponent Theories */

2016-04-30T10:35:52Z

Proponent Theories

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:35, 30 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).		This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).

	~~== Proponent Theories ==~~		Very nice site!
	* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive basic theory <ref>[[File:EmDrive Basic Theory.ppt]]</ref>
	* Roger Shawyer's EMDrive full theory paper <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/theorypaper9-4.pdf Roger Shawyer EMDrive Theory]</ref>
	* Prof. Juan Yang's theory <ref>[http://www.emdrive.com/yang-juan-paper-2012.pdf Prof Juan Yang EMDrive Theory and Results]</ref>
	* Dr. Harold Sonny White's Quantum vacuum plasma thruster model (QVP thruster)
	* [[Evanescent waves]]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1330521#msg1330521 2/2/15 post by @aero modeled evanescent waves] using [http://ab-initio.mit.edu/wiki/index.php/Meep MEEP]. Conclusion was that, due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, these were of insufficient magnitude to explain the thrust.</ref>
	* [[@notsosureofit Hypothesis]]
	* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
	* [[Todd Desiato (@WarpTech)'s Evanescent Wave Theory]]
	* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref> - The magnitude of the bending needed, was not shown by the thermal camera images taken at Eagleworks.
	* Declan Traill's suggested Classical Physics explanation <ref>[http://vixra.org/abs/1508.0043 Classical Physics explanation]</ref>

	== Debunking Theories ==		== Debunking Theories ==