Theory: Difference between revisions

From EM Drive
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(→‎Proponent Theories: Providing Mike McCulloch with his page.)
(Added "Curving Rf beams" by aero)
Line 23: Line 23:
* Notsosureofit's Equivalence Principle hypothesis <ref>http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1375157#msg1375157</ref>
* Notsosureofit's Equivalence Principle hypothesis <ref>http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1375157#msg1375157</ref>
* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
* [[Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory]]
* Curving Rf beams<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1379281#msg1379281 Post by @aero]</ref>


8/5/14 - Greg Egan [http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Cavity/Cavity.html modeled the resonant modes of a conical cavity].
8/5/14 - Greg Egan [http://www.gregegan.net/SCIENCE/Cavity/Cavity.html modeled the resonant modes of a conical cavity].

Revision as of 08:49, 25 May 2015

This page will outline some candidate theories of operation (or non-operation).

Debunking Theories

  • These theories should be explained, then debunked with the simplest explanation, with a link to a dedicated page to show the work or work in progress that backs up that explanation.

Experimental error

  • It's all a hoax/conspiracy
  • Simple measuring error
  • Thermal effects
  • Mechanical vibration
  • Magnetic effects with environment

These are discussed in more detail at Possible Error Sources.

Proponent Theories

8/5/14 - Greg Egan modeled the resonant modes of a conical cavity.

References

<references />