|
|
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | The current best-estimates for the dimensions of various test articles is here, along with the relevant experimental parameters and reported forces. Note that complete dimensions are not known in most cases, and some had to be determined via indirect methods (e.g., estimation from photographs).
| + | All known and estimated device parameters and results have been moved to [[Experimental Results]]. |
| − | | |
| − | Credit to Dr. Rodal and others for the great effort in [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376840#msg1376840 compiling these]. Please note some caveats for this data, at that link.
| |
| − | | |
| − | {| class="wikitable"
| |
| − | ! style="text-align:left;"| Description || Cavity Length (m) || bigDiameter (m) || smallDiameter (m) || rfFrequency (1/s) || Power (W) || Q || Force (mN) || Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) || Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) || Multiple of Photon Rocket
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Cannae Superconducting || 0.03 || 0.220 || 0.200 || 1.047*10^9 || 10.5 || 1.1*10^7 || 8-10 || 761.9 - 952.4 || 0.003336 || 228400 - 285500
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Shawyer Experimental || 0.156 || 0.16 || 0.1025 || 2.45*10^9 || 850 || 5900 || 16 || 18.82 || 0.003337 || 5640
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Shawyer Demo|| 0.345 || 0.28 || 0.09613 || 2.45*10^9 || 421-1200|| 45000 || 102.30 || 80-243 || 0.003337 || 23980 - 72830
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Brady a TM Mode|| 0.2286 || 0.2794 || 0.15875 || 1.9326*10^9 || 16.9||7320 || 0.0912|| 5.396 || 0.003337 || 1617.2
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Brady b TM Mode|| 0.2286 || 0.2794 || 0.15875 || 1.9367*10^9 || 16.7|| 18100 || 0.0501|| 3.000 || 0.003337 ||899.12
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Brady c TM Mode|| 0.2286 || 0.2794 || 0.15875 || 1.8804*10^9 || 2.6|| 22000 || 0.05541|| 21.31 || 0.003337 || 6386.7
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |Fearn, Zachar, Woodward & Wanser - piezoelectric MET thruster<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1376924#msg1376924 Forum post by @Rodal] - Included here because Prof. Woodward's device is also a propellant-less concept, and because Paul March (NASA) maintains that Prof. Woodward's Mach Effect theory might also be, in his opinion, an explanation for thrust for the EM Drive.</ref>|| n/a || n/a || n/a || 39300 || 170|| 22000 || 0.002|| 0.01176 || 0.003337 || 3.526
| |
| − | |-
| |
| − | |}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == References ==
| |
| − | <references/>
| |
Latest revision as of 11:23, 20 May 2015
All known and estimated device parameters and results have been moved to Experimental Results.
