Difference between revisions of "Evanescent waves"

From EM Drive
Jump to: navigation, search
(Evidence: Added links to MEEP control file post.)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
This list was assembled by Aero<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1382092#msg1382092 Forum post by @aero]</ref>
 
This list was assembled by Aero<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=37642.msg1382092#msg1382092 Forum post by @aero]</ref>
  
* http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.0547.pdf - See Supplementary Table 1.
+
* [http://arxiv.org/pdf/1308.0547.pdf "Extraordinary momentum and spin in evanescent waves"] by Konstantin Y. Bliokh, Aleksandr Y. Bekshaev, and Franco Nori - See Supplementary Table 1.
 
* http://arxiv.org/pdf/0712.0347.pdf
 
* http://arxiv.org/pdf/0712.0347.pdf
 
* http://wwwsis.lnf.infn.it/pub/INFN-FM-00-04.pdf - I like Appendix B
 
* http://wwwsis.lnf.infn.it/pub/INFN-FM-00-04.pdf - I like Appendix B

Revision as of 12:45, 1 June 2015

As proposed by Aero on the NSF forums, the possibility that the thrust is occurring as a result of the generation/leakage of evanescent waves.

Status

No longer considered a viable source of thrust.

Evidence

Initial calculations by Aero were showing an efficiency rating 2-3 times that of a perfect photon drive, which is beneath the observed ratings of Q-thruster test articles.[1]

Utilizing MEEP, the conclusion was that due to rapid dropoff at the frustum surface, evanescent waves were of insufficient magnitude to explain the observed thrust.[2]. See details about @aero's MEEP control file.

Relevant Papers

This list was assembled by Aero[3]

References