Difference between revisions of "Mike McCulloch's MiHsC Theory"

From EM Drive
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added preface explaining basics of MiHsC, added predictions of theory, other minor edits for clarity.)
Line 1: Line 1:
Mike McCulloch's theory loosely explained is that the EM Drive emits [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect Unruh Radiation.]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1319944#msg1319944 Rodal on McCulloch's theory.]</ref><ref>[http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/mihsc-vs-emdrive-data-3d.html 13/2/15 post by Mike McCulloch, MiHsC vs Emdrive: 3d]</ref><ref>[http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2015/PP-40-15.PDF McCulloch, M.E., 2015. Can the emdrive be explained by quantised inertia? Progress in Physics, 11, 1, 78-80]</ref> See also: http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/
+
Mike McCulloch's theory is that the EmDrive thrust results from an internal pressure differential in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect Unruh Radiation.]<ref>[http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1319944#msg1319944 Rodal on McCulloch's theory.]</ref><ref>[http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/mihsc-vs-emdrive-data-3d.html 13/2/15 post by Mike McCulloch, MiHsC vs Emdrive: 3d]</ref><ref>[http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2015/PP-40-15.PDF McCulloch, M.E., 2015. Can the emdrive be explained by quantised inertia? Progress in Physics, 11, 1, 78-80]</ref> See also: http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/
  
== Explanation ==
+
== Explanation of MiHsC Theory ==
  
The assumption is that the inertial mass of the photons in the cavity is due to Unruh radiation (MiHsC) which is damped more by the cavity at the narrow end. A photon going towards the wide end then gains mass, & to conserve momentum in our reference frame, its frame, the cavity, must move towards the narrow end. The predicted thrust is, approximately, for a truncated cone cavity:
+
Modified Hubble-scale Casimir Effect Theory, or MiHsC, is a theory developed by Mike McCullough, a physicist at Plymouth University in Plymouth, England. The theory attempts to explain the cause of inertia, which is not completely explained by general and special relativity.  MiHsC theory relies on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mach%27s_principle Mach's Principle], which states that distant objects can influence inertia of mass.  But there is a boundary as to how far away the objects influencing intertia can be.  This boundary is the point at which light (and therefore any information) will never be able to reach an object because universal expansion outpaces the speed of light.  Anything beyond this point (called the Rindler event horizon) is outside the observable universe and therefore can't effect the object at the center of the Rindler space.  MiHsC further posits that the Rindler event horizon is effectively the same as a black hole's event horizon.  At a black hole's event horizon, quantum virtual particle pairs are occaisionally separated by gravity resulting in particle emissions known as Hawking Radiation.  For a Rindler horizon, a similar radiation is suspected to exist called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect Unruh radiation].  MiHsC posts that Unruh radiation causes inertia.  As a particle moves, the Rindler information horizon expands in the direction of travel, and contracts behind it.  This results in a pressure differential in the Unruh radiation experienced by the moving object.  More Unruh radiation hits the object from the direction of travel, resulting in the effect we observe as inertia. In addition to explaining EmDrive motion witout violating Conservation of Momentum, MiHsC theory also notably resolves the observed discrepancies in galactic spin and cosmological expansion without the need for dark matter or dark energy.
 +
 
 +
== Application to EmDrive ==
 +
 
 +
In the case of the EmDrive, the metal walls act as the event horizon for Unruh radiation created within the cavity.  The wavelengths of this radiation are normally light-years across, but inside the EmDrive they are compressed to roughly the size of the EmDrive.  Fewer Unruh waves will fit at the small end of the fustrum, resulting in a pressure differential. Photons at the larger end therefore have a higher inertial mass, and to conserve momentum in our reference frame, its frame, the cavity, must move towards the narrow end. The predicted thrust is, approximately, for a truncated cone cavity:
  
 
F = P Q L/c * (1/Ds - 1/Db)
 
F = P Q L/c * (1/Ds - 1/Db)
Line 11: Line 15:
 
== Status ==
 
== Status ==
  
The prediction agrees reasonably well with the data.
+
Dr. McCullough is still refining his theory with respect to the EmDrive and intends to publish additional papers which may include testable predictions for the EmDrive.
 +
 
 +
== Predictions & Evidence ==
 +
The derivation & comparisons with the data are given in this paper: [http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2015/PP-40-15.PDF Can the Emdrive Be Explained by Quantised Inertia?]  The predictions are in rough agreement with the observed thrust of various experiements.  Further testing is necessary to exclude enironmental artifacts.
  
== Evidence ==
+
MiHsC predicts that increasing either input power and Q factor (or both) will result in greater thrust. Thrust is also inversely proportional to the speed of light.  By introducing a dielectric medium such as water to the interior, the microwaves would be slowed resulting in greater thrust. In addition, by changing the input Rf frequency, it should be possible to cause the Unruh radiation to better fit in the small end than the large. This would result in thrust in the opposite direction.
The derivation & comparisons with the data are given in this paper: [http://www.ptep-online.com/index_files/2015/PP-40-15.PDF Can the Emdrive Be Explained by Quantised Inertia?]
 
  
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
<references />
 
<references />

Revision as of 07:49, 1 June 2015

Mike McCulloch's theory is that the EmDrive thrust results from an internal pressure differential in Unruh Radiation.[1][2][3] See also: http://physicsfromtheedge.blogspot.co.uk/

Explanation of MiHsC Theory

Modified Hubble-scale Casimir Effect Theory, or MiHsC, is a theory developed by Mike McCullough, a physicist at Plymouth University in Plymouth, England. The theory attempts to explain the cause of inertia, which is not completely explained by general and special relativity. MiHsC theory relies on Mach's Principle, which states that distant objects can influence inertia of mass. But there is a boundary as to how far away the objects influencing intertia can be. This boundary is the point at which light (and therefore any information) will never be able to reach an object because universal expansion outpaces the speed of light. Anything beyond this point (called the Rindler event horizon) is outside the observable universe and therefore can't effect the object at the center of the Rindler space. MiHsC further posits that the Rindler event horizon is effectively the same as a black hole's event horizon. At a black hole's event horizon, quantum virtual particle pairs are occaisionally separated by gravity resulting in particle emissions known as Hawking Radiation. For a Rindler horizon, a similar radiation is suspected to exist called Unruh radiation. MiHsC posts that Unruh radiation causes inertia. As a particle moves, the Rindler information horizon expands in the direction of travel, and contracts behind it. This results in a pressure differential in the Unruh radiation experienced by the moving object. More Unruh radiation hits the object from the direction of travel, resulting in the effect we observe as inertia. In addition to explaining EmDrive motion witout violating Conservation of Momentum, MiHsC theory also notably resolves the observed discrepancies in galactic spin and cosmological expansion without the need for dark matter or dark energy.

Application to EmDrive

In the case of the EmDrive, the metal walls act as the event horizon for Unruh radiation created within the cavity. The wavelengths of this radiation are normally light-years across, but inside the EmDrive they are compressed to roughly the size of the EmDrive. Fewer Unruh waves will fit at the small end of the fustrum, resulting in a pressure differential. Photons at the larger end therefore have a higher inertial mass, and to conserve momentum in our reference frame, its frame, the cavity, must move towards the narrow end. The predicted thrust is, approximately, for a truncated cone cavity:

F = P Q L/c * (1/Ds - 1/Db)

where c is the speed of light in the medium inside the cavity, P is input power (watt), Q is the quality factor of resonance, L is the cavity length (meter), Ds is the small end diameter (meter) and Db the big end diameter (meter).

Status

Dr. McCullough is still refining his theory with respect to the EmDrive and intends to publish additional papers which may include testable predictions for the EmDrive.

Predictions & Evidence

The derivation & comparisons with the data are given in this paper: Can the Emdrive Be Explained by Quantised Inertia? The predictions are in rough agreement with the observed thrust of various experiements. Further testing is necessary to exclude enironmental artifacts.

MiHsC predicts that increasing either input power and Q factor (or both) will result in greater thrust. Thrust is also inversely proportional to the speed of light. By introducing a dielectric medium such as water to the interior, the microwaves would be slowed resulting in greater thrust. In addition, by changing the input Rf frequency, it should be possible to cause the Unruh radiation to better fit in the small end than the large. This would result in thrust in the opposite direction.

References