Difference between revisions of "Q Factor"

From EM Drive
Jump to: navigation, search
 
(19 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The quality factor, also known as the "Q factor", "Q value", or just "Q", is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the energy loss of a resonating cavity with respect to the energy stored in the cavity.
+
The quality factor, also known as the '''Q factor''', '''Q value''', or just '''Q''', is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the energy loss of a resonating cavity with respect to the energy stored in the cavity.
 
See the [[Wikipedia:Q factor|Wikipedia entry]] for a more general and detailed description.
 
See the [[Wikipedia:Q factor|Wikipedia entry]] for a more general and detailed description.
 +
 
There are multiple, incompatible ways to measure this parameter, and there has been considerable debate on the NSF forums as to which is most appropriate for the EM Drive.
 
There are multiple, incompatible ways to measure this parameter, and there has been considerable debate on the NSF forums as to which is most appropriate for the EM Drive.
Regardless, publicized experiments have so far reported the [[#Unloaded Q factor|unloaded Q factor]], even though the [[#Loaded Q factor|loaded Q factor]] is generally considered the standard technique outside of the EM Drive research community.{{Citation needed}}
+
Experimenters have so far reported the [[#Unloaded Q factor|unloaded Q factor]].
 +
However, the [[#Loaded Q factor|loaded Q factor]] is generally considered the standard technique for measuring the Q factor of closed resonant cavities outside of the EM Drive research community.{{Citation needed|{{subst:DATE}}}}
 +
This difference may explain why the published Q factors of EM Drives are much higher than what is considered possible outside of theory without using advanced techniques such as superconducting cavities.
  
 
There is no standard notation to distinguish between the method used.
 
There is no standard notation to distinguish between the method used.
We use [[#Loaded Q factor|"Q<sub>l</sub>"]] to explicitly denote the ''loaded'' Q factor and [[#Unloaded Q factor|"Q<sub>u</sub>"]] to denote the ''unloaded'' Q factor.
+
We use [[#Loaded Q factor|'''Q<sub>L</sub>''']] to explicitly denote the ''loaded'' Q factor and [[#Unloaded Q factor|'''Q<sub>u</sub>''']]
 +
( also known as [[#Unloaded Q factor|'''Q<sub>0</sub>''']]) to denote the ''unloaded'' Q factor, but there is some evidence in the literature.
 +
http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pierm05/02.08100704.pdf
 +
 
 +
== Loaded Q factor (Q<sub>L</sub>) ==
  
== Loaded Q factor (Q<sub>l</sub>) ==
+
This is typically used for resonant cavities.
  
 +
=== Method ===
 +
Measure the S12 or S21 2-port return loss.
 +
See http://docs.lumerical.com/en/diffractive_optics_cavity_q_calculation.html
 +
and http://www-elsa.physik.uni-bonn.de/Lehrveranstaltungen/FP-E106/E106-Erlaeuterungen.pdf (German version).
 
== Unloaded Q factor (Q<sub>u</sub>) ==
 
== Unloaded Q factor (Q<sub>u</sub>) ==
 +
 +
This is typically used for antennas.
 +
 +
=== Method ===
 +
Measure the S11 return loss at the 3dB down bandwidth.

Latest revision as of 11:51, 28 August 2015

The quality factor, also known as the Q factor, Q value, or just Q, is a dimensionless parameter that characterizes the energy loss of a resonating cavity with respect to the energy stored in the cavity. See the Wikipedia entry for a more general and detailed description.

There are multiple, incompatible ways to measure this parameter, and there has been considerable debate on the NSF forums as to which is most appropriate for the EM Drive. Experimenters have so far reported the unloaded Q factor. However, the loaded Q factor is generally considered the standard technique for measuring the Q factor of closed resonant cavities outside of the EM Drive research community.Template:Citation needed This difference may explain why the published Q factors of EM Drives are much higher than what is considered possible outside of theory without using advanced techniques such as superconducting cavities.

There is no standard notation to distinguish between the method used. We use QL to explicitly denote the loaded Q factor and Qu ( also known as Q0) to denote the unloaded Q factor, but there is some evidence in the literature. http://www.jpier.org/PIERM/pierm05/02.08100704.pdf

Loaded Q factor (QL)

This is typically used for resonant cavities.

Method

Measure the S12 or S21 2-port return loss. See http://docs.lumerical.com/en/diffractive_optics_cavity_q_calculation.html and http://www-elsa.physik.uni-bonn.de/Lehrveranstaltungen/FP-E106/E106-Erlaeuterungen.pdf (German version).

Unloaded Q factor (Qu)

This is typically used for antennas.

Method

Measure the S11 return loss at the 3dB down bandwidth.