|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | I'm added Iulian's test to the page. I realize that it is just approximate numbers and there are a lot of unknowns, but I think its useful to add as a rough comparison, as people can actually watch Iulian's test and this table helps put that measurement in relation to the other tests.
| + | Any objections to adding the TE012 test where no thrust was measured as a line in the chart? See the Brady et.al paper page 18. --[[User:Sfrank|Sfrank]] ([[User talk:Sfrank|talk]]) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (PDT) |
| − | | |
| − | Anyone want to take a stab at adding Juan Yang's published results? Also, are there more EW results to add?
| |
| − | | |
| − | Also is it worthwhile adding a column for Mode? We don't have this for all, but it seems to be a particularly useful bit of data to include.
| |
| − | | |
| − | _________________________
| |
| − | | |
| − | Yes, adding another column for mode shapes would be a good idea, but IMHO it would be more important to add first a column for Pressure conditions, to differentiate between partial vauum (the Torr or another unit should be used instead of just stating vacuum) and the other tests under ambient conditions as it has been the prevailing criticism from scientists that only NASA has conducted tests in a partial vacuum
| |
| − | | |
| − | _________________________
| |
Revision as of 13:16, 5 June 2015
Any objections to adding the TE012 test where no thrust was measured as a line in the chart? See the Brady et.al paper page 18. --Sfrank (talk) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (PDT)
