Difference between revisions of "Talk:Experimental Results"
From EM Drive
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Any objections to adding the TE012 test where no thrust was measured as a line in the chart? See the Brady et.al paper page 18. --[[User:Sfrank|Sfrank]] ([[User talk:Sfrank|talk]]) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (PDT) | Any objections to adding the TE012 test where no thrust was measured as a line in the chart? See the Brady et.al paper page 18. --[[User:Sfrank|Sfrank]] ([[User talk:Sfrank|talk]]) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | __________________________________ | ||
Yes several objections, noted in the thread. It was performed at the very earliest in NASA's testing program, @TheTraveller made an argument that it was conducted at the wrong frequency, not enough details are given in the Brady report to resolve this. Suggest to wait until NASA conducts the tests without a dielectric this summer (with a magnetron). | Yes several objections, noted in the thread. It was performed at the very earliest in NASA's testing program, @TheTraveller made an argument that it was conducted at the wrong frequency, not enough details are given in the Brady report to resolve this. Suggest to wait until NASA conducts the tests without a dielectric this summer (with a magnetron). | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | __________________________________ | ||
Revision as of 14:31, 5 June 2015
Any objections to adding the TE012 test where no thrust was measured as a line in the chart? See the Brady et.al paper page 18. --Sfrank (talk) 13:16, 5 June 2015 (PDT)
__________________________________
Yes several objections, noted in the thread. It was performed at the very earliest in NASA's testing program, @TheTraveller made an argument that it was conducted at the wrong frequency, not enough details are given in the Brady report to resolve this. Suggest to wait until NASA conducts the tests without a dielectric this summer (with a magnetron).
__________________________________
