Difference between revisions of "Talk:Experimental Results"

From EM Drive
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
I'm thinking about adding Iulian's test(s) to this page.  Its a little difficult because it was not a precision measurement and there are several unknowns (exact wattage, Q Factor).  If we post his results, I was thinking of just posting it as an average of tests 3 and 3.1 subtracting out the likely effects of hot air.  deltaMass did a calculation that came out to 0.29gf effective thrust, which is 2.84mN  See [http://forum.nasaspaceflight.com/index.php?topic=36313.msg1377713#msg1377713 here]. So here's what I have so far:
+
I'm added Iulian's test to the page.  I realize that it is just approximate numbers and there are a lot of unknowns, but I think its useful to add as a rough comparison, as people can actually watch Iulian's test and this table helps put that measurement in relation to the other tests.
{| class="wikitable"
 
! style="text-align:left;"| Description || Cavity Length (m) || bigDiameter (m) || smallDiameter (m) || Design Factor (Shawyer Only) || Dielectric || rfFrequency (1/s) || Power (W) || Q || Force (mN) || Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) || Photon Rocket Force / PowerInput (mN/kW) || Force Multiple of Photon Rocket
 
|-
 
|Iulian Berca Tests 3 & 3.1 (averaged w/ air effects subtracted)|| 0.02286 || 0.02794 || 0.01588 || || None || 2.463Ghz (magnetron) ||  800 || n/a || 2.84 || 3.55 || 0.003337 ||  1063.82
 
|-
 
|}
 

Revision as of 06:58, 1 June 2015

I'm added Iulian's test to the page. I realize that it is just approximate numbers and there are a lot of unknowns, but I think its useful to add as a rough comparison, as people can actually watch Iulian's test and this table helps put that measurement in relation to the other tests.