Difference between revisions of "User talk:Kdhilliard"
From EM Drive
Kdhilliard (talk | contribs) (Introduction) |
Kdhilliard (talk | contribs) (→Introduction: Fixed sig -- talk page only) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
I'm happy to contribute in general, but I am particularly interest adding skeptical examples along with rebuttals (where I can find them) of how the EM Drive is argued to violate the conservation of momentum and/or energy or how it could be used as a free energy machine. | I'm happy to contribute in general, but I am particularly interest adding skeptical examples along with rebuttals (where I can find them) of how the EM Drive is argued to violate the conservation of momentum and/or energy or how it could be used as a free energy machine. | ||
| − | I am very skeptical of this device, but am open to all ideas and evidence, and certainly agree that, in the end, experimental results determine theory, and results should never be discounted purely because they appear to violate existing theory. -- | + | I am very skeptical of this device, but am open to all ideas and evidence, and certainly agree that, in the end, experimental results determine theory, and results should never be discounted purely because they appear to violate existing theory. -- [[User talk:Kdhilliard|kdhilliard]] 07:55, 15 May 2015 (PDT) |
Latest revision as of 07:55, 15 May 2015
Introduction
Kirk Hilliard. B.S. Mathematics, University of Florida, 1994.
I'm happy to contribute in general, but I am particularly interest adding skeptical examples along with rebuttals (where I can find them) of how the EM Drive is argued to violate the conservation of momentum and/or energy or how it could be used as a free energy machine.
I am very skeptical of this device, but am open to all ideas and evidence, and certainly agree that, in the end, experimental results determine theory, and results should never be discounted purely because they appear to violate existing theory. -- kdhilliard 07:55, 15 May 2015 (PDT)
